Site Title

Many patterns are emerging, one of which is a series of events that keeps replaying in different ways like a mercury retrograde exclusively,  or loosely tailored to specific narratives directed at people and or situations involving critical events that have been exaggerated, or that have allegedly taken place. Appearing to be more structurally orchestrated, as it advances over time.

These patterns raise questions about who the people and or groups are that are able to employ or blackmail people into lying or those who just choose to lie about the actions of those they have accused of certain behaviors knowing that it will tarnish the image of the person or persons they are speaking of.

It is also amplified through beguiling rhetoric, originating from sources that are not immediately visible, yet appear to benefit from the resulting outcomes of
slander / defamation of character that can lead to serious consequences for those being targeted by the rhetoric.

It’s a recurring dynamic in which individuals knowingly attempt to place others in harm’s way, with misinformation, intentional misrepresentation having complete  understanding concerning the reprocussions for the Falsely Accused who will be subjected to continuous harassment via rumors, gossip and ostracism intended to ruin careers and or the reputations of those being targeted.
It confirms the possibility that there are  influences that  are directly and indirectly attempting to shape the way these individuals are viewed by the public, their families, peers and colleagues in order to distort perceptions in ways that primarily benefit those who want the Falsely Accused to be affected dire consequences.

It is  intended to affect and cause those who are easily influenced; especially those with mental health disorders/issues  into taking harmful actions against innocent people. Like third-party reactive abuse. It reminds me of a manual I read about violence in the workplace which can provoke third-party reactions when a person overhears a conversation or something they find insulting even though it wasn’t directed towards them.

It is worth examining because the focus should also be directed towards the source of the information and the character of that person.

When attention is repeatedly drawn to accusations, it can deflect / distract the public’s attention from structural leadership responsibility. A planned distraction.
These patterns warrant a closer analysis.